User talk:Pacific1982

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pacific1982 has not edited Wikipedia since April 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello Pacific, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. You can learn more on the how to edit page. The naming conventions and style guide pages are also useful. There is a sandbox which you can use to experiment in. If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela 04:17, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Vandalism

Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress. Most of the time, simply reverting the page a single time is good enough and a report isn't needed. To revert a page, go to the Page History, and click to edit the last good post. Leave contents exactly as they are, and put in the Summary some information like "revert vandalism by user:213.122.43.100 to last edit by User:Nikai". I did so for Film. --zandperl 16:50, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Thank you! --Pacific1982 19:50, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I think you've been had

You created a disambig page for Daniel Greene. However there is no such person as Daniel Greene (pop singer). This was vandalism created by anon, using info from Geri Halliwell, and placign it on Daniel Greene page - which I take it you then moved to a seperate article. I think I've sorted it out and marked the appropriate pages for deletion. I assume you had nothing to do with the original vandalism. --Doc Glasgow 15:28, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just read your talk on the page - I see that is exactly what happened - --Doc Glasgow 15:31, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Viola

I see that you changed alliterator's "Viola!" at Talk:Veronica Mars#Episode Pages to "Voilà!". I was tempted to do this as well, but I assumed Alliterator might have been deliberately misusing the term, as is often done by English speakers affecting bad French. I was going to quote my favorite instance of this from Mystery Science Theater 3000, but to my horror, and despite the fact that I am a major contributor to Wikiquote and MST3K is my favorite show, I can't for the life of me recall exactly what Pearl Forrester said when she did this. C'est très damage. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:22, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the "heads-up" concerning how the misspelling of voilà may have been intentional. I'm also a fan of MST3K, but I'm not hard-core enough to remember that specific line of Pearl's. I will leave it to Alliterator to do a revert on that if desired. Pacific1982 15:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need for info

Dear Pacific1982,

I'm writing from it.wiki to have some advice about copyrighted images. I wanted to upload to Commons the image about Darius Milhaud but its template states it as a copyrighted pictur. What conditions let it remain on en.wikipedia? I noticed that some other pictures (scans from sheet music in Olivier Messiaen) have the same status. I'd be delighted to scan some of the scores I bought to embellish my music articles, but I didn't understand what makes them liable here on en.wiki and uneligible on Commons. I could download thos pictures on my hard disk and upload them on it.wiki, but I fear controversy about copyright issues.

Forgive my bad English. Thank you in advance for your kind reply. - εΔ ω 16:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

If I am not mistaken, such copyrighted images can be put onto Wikipedia under certain conditions of fair use. If I may paraphrase: "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of promotional material (1) to illustrate the work or product in question; (2) in the absence of free images that could serve such a purpose; (3) on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, (4) qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law."

I don't know or understand what the rules are concerning the Italian Wikipedia, or the transfer of images from English Wikipedia to Italian Wikipedia. You may need to ask those in charge how the copyright laws apply on your site. All I know is that "fair use" of a copyrighted image is OK. Pacific1982 20:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bob Sacamento

Your recent edit to Bob Sacamento (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's Sacamento

How many times to people have to say this???

It is Sacamento not "Sacamano", "Sacomano", or "Sacamanto".

If you have time, please change it to the way it should be.

Thanks!

Sincerely,

Psdubow and Cocoaguy

License tagging for Image:Letterpaper1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Letterpaper1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Small-world.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Small-world.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Small-world.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Small-world.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ilana Donna Arazie

A tag has been placed on Ilana Donna Arazie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pruneau^talk 16:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EliNavarro1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EliNavarro1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EliNavarro1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EliNavarro1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Viscott

I have nominated David Viscott, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Viscott. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 00:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Renfair-irwin3.jpg

File:Renfair-irwin3.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Renfair-irwin3.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Renfair-irwin3.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pacific1982! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

James Darren - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaza at Del Mar.jpgg

Did you forget to add a license tag for this image when uploading.?

Wikipedia takes copyrights seriously, so images need to have an appropriate license tag

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/All and Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators which will assist you :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Small-world.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Small-world.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]