Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-violent child discipline
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Nicely written, but woefully POV and questionably encyclopedic. - Lucky 6.9 17:29, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
There's useful stuff here which can be used for an NPOV rewrite ("proponents say..."), and there is no child discipline article in the first place, which is an omission... -- Anon.Also, what about "lead by example" as a method of child discipline? -- Anon.- Sorry, Anons. Anonymous votes do not count. - Lucky 6.9 18:18, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - it's an encyclopaedic topic. Mark POV and send to cleanup - David Gerard 18:20, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Change it to be more cyclopedic; don't delete it. The subject has been too long ignored by the mainstream, to our chagrin. Raina
- Sockpuppets don't count, either. I'm OK with a cleanup if anyone thinks this can be made NPOV. Always better to keep something potentially useful. - Lucky 6.9 20:16, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. I've added a child discipline stub, which could be greatly expanded as part of this. Andrewa 21:23, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. jengod 23:56, Jul 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and fix. Pretty good article. Quite a lot of specific content. Topic is encyclopedic enough. Yes, it does have POV problems. "Speak roughly to your little boy/And beat him when he sneezes/He only does it to annoy/Because he knows it teases." —Lewis Carroll. "He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes." —Proverbs 13:24 Dpbsmith 01:52, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, but send to Cleanup - as much as the appearance of sockpuppets makes me wary. Ambivalenthysteria 04:34, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Lucky & Ambivalenthysteria, I did not appreciate the first accusation but let it pass. With this second one, I will respond that I am a mother and grandmother, not particularly computer-savvy nor very good at writing, who has never written anything here in any attempt to hide my identity. I would appreciate it if you would cease your accusations. Perhaps you don't like my subject matter, but I appreciate your comments to leave it. Thank you. I do appreciate all the rewrites. Thank you for those. -- Raina
Sorry! I didn't know how to do this before! :-) Raina 05:52, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with child discipline and redirect. Jay 15:41, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- No further accusations on this end. Promise. Historically, anonymous votes are frowned upon here and it's rare that a legitimate new user jumps into the discussion. Please accept my apologies and welcome to the club! - Lucky 6.9 20:56, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Definitely a keeper!! By the way we need a category for 'parenting' articles is category:Parenting suitable? Erich 06:50, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Comment: No problem, Lucky, and thank you! :-D Raina 03:36, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC) (Comment moved here from vfd main space by Graham ☺ | Talk)